The new Short Term Rental Review Board has scheduled work sessions on August 22 and August 29 regarding short-term vacation rentals in Talbot County. As homeowners who have had to live with a short term vacation rental in our neighborhood, we submit the following comments.

There has been an unwanted short-term rental home (STR) in our community for the past four years. We have experienced many of the same problems other neighborhoods have in terms of extra noise, traffic, strangers, disrespect and discourtesy. We have found the complaint process to be onerous, time-consuming, convoluted, hard to fathom, and frustrating. Despite the code 190 changes, STR monitoring remains the “job” of neighbors, some of whom have no idea where to start. There have been some improvements due to the diligence of the Short-Term Rental Review Board. However, much remains to be done.

Access to our community is via a one lane private drive. Maintenance of this private road is shared among the homeowners who use it. There is a posted speed limit of 10 mph but no means of enforcement. Traffic on our road has increased in numbers and speed due to the STR; turnarounds in our driveway at the end of the private road have definitely increased. Renters are frequently unfamiliar with the courtesies required on a one lane private road with people, bicycles, vehicles, dogs, etc., sharing the road. On several occasions, while walking my dogs or biking, I have had to jump off the road into the ditch next to it in order to avoid a car that was zooming towards or out of the STR driveway. It can be downright dangerous. Promises have been made to keep “rules of the road” posted in the STR. It is unknown whether that has happened, but this issue requires more than a wink and a nod. STR owners and managers must point them out and renters must read them. They should be part of the lease.

We strongly suggest that STR licenses should be granted only to applicants whose houses have public access. Put another way, a short-term rental license should not be issued if the property is located on a private road or drive or offers use of a shared pier without written approval from all property owners responsible for shared maintenance of said road, drive, or pier. It should not be the county’s prerogative to expand other homeowners’ risks, responsibilities, and expenses to enable the financial gain of nonresident owners and, increasingly, investors. As it stands now, neighbors get all the negatives associated with STRs and STR owner/investors get all the positives.

DONNA AND BILL DUDLEY

Easton

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.